Four art operators reflect

What is 'contemporary' in performing arts today? What at first seems to be a very simple question actually has no straight or univocal answer at all. Can 'contemporary' be placed in opposition to 'traditional' or are these two abstract terms in a continuous relationship, in a state of flux, a love affair? How far is the 'contemporary' in performing arts related to the 'reality' of any given spot on Earth? What is the role and effect of history on the contemporary, whether this be a personal, a local or a global history? What about the effects of the broader cultural context? And what about political situations?

We already have a lot of questions here. In fact they just get more ambiguous and complex if we consider them in our age of migration of people from diverse cultural backgrounds. Which connotations do terms like 'contemporary', 'modern' and 'traditional' carry in other contexts, in different cultures and societies? If we present an artist whose work is locally considered to be 'new', 'fresh' and/or 'radical' 5000 miles away from his home base, will this other audience read the work in the same way?

We are living in the digital age. How does technology affect our thinking about 'contemporary'? Do new techniques and influences from other disciplines such as science necessarily have a positive effect on performing arts?

We discussed these and a lot more issues with four performing arts operators hailing from different parts of Asia and Europe. Their reflections function as gateways, as openings for further discussion. If anything, they make one thing clear: thinking about the 'contemporary' brings up many more questions than answers. Questions that point towards other layers and angles implicated by this highly complex and utterly captivating matter.

Proofread by Eleanor Hadley Kershaw